Source-first setup
We begin with the official ballot text, fiscal note, public filing, candidate answers, and campaign materials your team approves.
Civitas gives every person a patient, one-on-one conversation with a ballot measure, tax proposal, proposition, or public question.
Ask in your own words. Rephrase. Follow up. Turn over every stone for as long as you need. Civitas answers from approved material, cites the source, and makes missing explanations visible to the responsible team.
Ask. Answer. Carry forward.
Civitas starts with sources the responsible team approves. Each person can ask, rephrase, and follow up in their own words without tiring the conversation. Every supported answer stays traceable, and every unsupported question becomes a visible gap instead of an invented response.
We begin with the official ballot text, fiscal note, public filing, candidate answers, and campaign materials your team approves.
Questions are welcomed as people actually express them, then mapped to the exact clause, cost, date, obligation, or missing explanation in the record.
Civitas answers with citations when the record supports it, then returns recurring questions and source gaps for responsible human review.
Focus Areas
Each measure or public question gets the same grounded listening system, tuned to the documents, concerns, and source gaps that matter in that community.
Tax renewals, bonds, millages, levies, charter amendments, propositions, and public questions.
What changes, who pays, where the money can be used, and when collections begin.
Issue positions, endorsements, biography, voting history, and voter-facing policy comparisons.
FAQ
Civitas is built for responsible teams that want every person to have time with a public decision while answers stay factual, neutral, and traceable.
Civitas turns an approved public record into a one-on-one guide. People ask questions in their own words, and the guide answers only when the source material supports the response.
Ballot text, fiscal notes, public filings, candidate answers, reviewed talking points, FAQs, deadlines, cost breakdowns, and any other material your team approves.
No. If the source does not support an answer, Civitas tells the person the material is missing and captures that gap for responsible review.
Yes. Ballot campaigns usually center on text, funding, timing, and legal effect. Candidate campaigns usually center on issue positions, biography, voting history, and public commitments.
Most launches depend on how quickly source materials are gathered and approved. Once the record is ready, we can shape the guide, guardrails, and reporting view quickly.
Your team sees repeated questions, unclear language, concerns, and missing explanations so you can improve the public record without inventing answers in the guide. These voluntary conversations are participation evidence, not automatically a representative poll.